Feedback

The Live Wire

  • Terry Macalister | Overseas investors join in criticism of UK energy bill

    • source icon
    • 14:23
  • Ed Balls | For the record, I was simply asking the Prime Minister, as he boasted the econom...

    • source icon
    • 14:23
  • Matt Chorley | What Arab democracy needs is more 80s pop references. Kay Burley on Sky News: "V...

    • source icon
    • 14:01
  • davidosler | Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right

    • source icon
    • 14:00
  • Sunny Hundal | Ed Miliband knows a referendum on the EU makes sense | Sunny Hundal

    • source icon
    • 13:54
  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers


Westminster News from Paul Waugh

The Waugh Room

News, gossip and insight from PoliticsHome Editor Paul Waugh

The Guardians of Oxbridge

Hacks frequently point out the sharp contrast between the Guardian's relentless assault on privilege and the lesser-known educational background* of its own staff.

Well, after years of jibes within the trade about its reputation as a bastion of Oxbridge elitism, it looks like the Gruan is now about to undergo a bit of self-analysis.

I've learned that the paper's readers' editor has emailed all staff asking "on condition of anonymity ... whether you attended Oxford and Cambridge"

The readers' editor's email states:

"If you did, do you believe this is [sic] affected your chances of getting a job at the Guardian?"

I've no idea what the paper will actually do with this crucial information, but maybe we can expect a front page splash on 'elitism' at the heart of one of Britain's most famous institutions.

I also wonder how many of the staff will admit "Yeah, I always knew that if I had a degree from Wolverhampton poly my job application would have been canned". Or will they actually say: "No, no, of course my Oxbridge degree didn't affect my chances of impressing the Editor. I know you are an equal opportunities employer!"

Sadly, this wee survey doesn't also ask staff whether they went to private school. But judging from a previous Guardian report, it's highly likely that they did. (Both Guido and Private Eye have been keen to point out the expensive schooling of key figures in the Guardian team).

Anyway, I'm sure that the paper will use its results to inform future, non-judgmental pieces on the Oxbridge make-up of the Cabinet.

Will other papers now follow its lead....?

 

 

*FOOTNOTE: In the interests of full transparency, I should point out that I am a comp-educated, Oxford graduate. From Rochdale.

And no, I haven't worked for the Guardian.

 

UPDATE: I now have the full email sent by Readers' Editor Chris Elliott (who, by the way, is not an Oxbridge graduate).

Dear colleagues,

there have been a couple of letters recently either complaining of Oxbridge bias or demanding to know more about the background of editors and senior correspondents on the basis that the readers should be told whether such factors are at work in the Guardian. I think it's an interesting issue that comes up from time to time. I am not going to attempt a comprehensive list but I would like to know-on conditions of anonymity-whether you attended Oxford and Cambridge. If you did, do you believe this is affected your chances of getting a job at the Guardian? If you didn't, do you think that fact made getting a job at the Guardian tougher. I would be interested in any views colleagues have about this perennial question, you may think it matters a lot or not one jot. The good news is that you don't have to swear.

best

Chris

 

Anyway, there was a pretty big response to this email from staff. Here's a selection from those who (either accidentally or deliberately) hit the Reply All button:

Hi Chris

I remember about 10 years ago at a morning conference there was a show of hands; about 50% of those attending were Oxbridge educated. It would be interesting to see if that's still the case. 

I didn't attend Oxbridge, and I do believe that made it harder for me to get a job here. It took me about 2 years to get a permanent contract in the late 90s, when I was working on short-term contracts and doing freelance shifts. But simultaneously I was aware that there were lots of people being recruited (to jobs that weren't being openly advertised) that had all known each other at Oxbridge.

Part of the problem is, people tend to recruit in their own image. But I strongly believe the Guardian would greatly benefit from a more diverse staff.

[name deleted]

This same person then added:

Having said that, an Oxbridge education may have taught me NOT TO INADVERTENTLY EMAIL EVERYONE. *gets coat, clears desk*

Another staffer wrote:

Far too many Cambridge people in my opinion. [name deleted] (Oxf 1968-71). Much more damaging though is the 99.99 percent London domicile of current staff and it is high time some of you moved out and not just at weekends.

Yet another wrote:

Dear Chris

Er, surely anyone on staff completed a CV including a question re higher education before their appointment … or did that only apply to oinks like me? 

Yours 

Firmly redbrick [name deleted]

Another respondee wrote:

About 11 or 12 years ago - not long after I signed up here -  in a conversation with a fellow Guardian employee, he asked me: 

"Where did you read?"

The rest of the conversation went as follows:

"Pardon me"

"Where did you read?"

"Read what?" 

"Where did you go to university?"

"Montreal"

When I turned away to get my pint, or my cigarette, or whatever this person walked away. 

Where did you read? ... It was explained later to me what that question actually means. I was offended.

 

Perhaps the most succinct missive was this one:

Does anyone think that going to Oxbridge *harmed* their chances of getting a job here?

 

FURTHER UPDATE: It seems the piece that triggered the whole thing may have been James Ball's data collection  on the public school/Oxbridge dominance of Who's Who. See here.

Leave a comment...

Tom

I would suggest there is a difference between on the one hand ex Oxbridge Guardian journalists, writing for a newspaper that we can choose to read or not read, and on the other hand ex Oxbridge politicians who are sitting in the cabinet making decisions which affect all of us, and whom we haven't necessarily chosen.

aristeides

Er, did we not choose them in an election about a year ago?

Herbert

Er, No. No-one voted for a coalition. (And what is it with these right-wingers and their 'Er'?)

aristeides

Right. So who should be in the cabinet then? (And what is it with these Herberts accusing anyone questioning their assumptions as being "right-wing"?)

Tom

"Right. So who should be in the cabinet then?"

Certainly not members of a party who promised at the election not to raise VAT, not to raise tuition fees and not to cut the deficit hard and fast.

aristeides

OK, not them. Then, who?

Kevin T

 Isn't it obvious? LABOUR MPS!! In a coalition with the LibDems and other minority parties, who would be similarly made to drop election pledges - but that would be different because it would be LABOUR making them do it.

aristeides

Thanks so much Kevin T. I knew I wasn't getting it. Are they the same Labour MPs who stood on a manifesto commitement to introducing AV, though?

Jon

To be fair I don't think Labour dropped their entire manifesto within weeks of forming a government as the Lib Dems have done.

DanGrover

Well, the actual *people* in question were voted in locally as individuals, irrespective of who the government end up being. I'm not usually one to pick up on this pedantry but when discussing the possible bias of the individuals in question, I think it's important to remember that they are elected individually. 

Kevin T

The point was about MPs, not the government. The Oxbridge educated MPs were chosen by their voters just like the Guardian is chosen by its readers.

Sungei Patani

The country voted for a coalition by not giving any particular party a majority of seats in parliament. The Conservative party though got the most votes and Labour the smallest number for a generation.

Had the electoral system been biased in favour of the Conservatives, in the way it is currently biased towards Labour, then there would have been a good working majority for the Conservatives.  The Liberals could then have continued in their woolly unrealistic ways untroubled by reality.

Jeremy Poynton

The main qualification to be a Guardian journalist is to possess a huge amount of sanctimony.

Herbert

The best way to get a post removed from the G's 'Comment is Free' is to list the private schools the paper's writers went to. The second best way is to list the Oxbridge colleges. Touchy.

forlornehope

There is a game to be had in seeing how fast the CiF moderators remove any comments that get under the skin of the Guardian's Novyklatura. Comments on people who got into Oxford with one A level get particularly short shrift.

Herbert

And questioning Martin Kettle's abiding affection for Blair is also a guarantee of being moderated out of existence.

Streatham

I just posted this on the Guardian 'Comment is Free'. It;ll be interesting to see how long it stays there: I was wondering whether the following was true and whether it will be the subject of a moderating injunction: 'Hacks frequently point out the sharp contrast between the Guardian's relentless assault on privilege and the lesser-known educational background* of its own staff. 'Well, after years of jibes within the trade about its reputation as a bastion of Oxbridge elitism, it looks like the Gruan is now about to undergo a bit of self-analysis. 'I've learned that the paper's readers' editor has emailed all staff asking "on condition of anonymity ... whether you attended Oxford and Cambridge" The readers' editor's email states: '"If you did, do you believe this is [sic] affected your chances of getting a job at the Guardian?"' http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/may/26/pcc-privacy-law-injunctions-editorial?commentpage=last#end-of-comments

Tom Greeves

Can we stop talking about Oxford and Cambridge as though they are not meritocratic? Having a degree from either is a convenient shorthand indicating that one is very clever. There should be no shame in that. I've worked in politics for over ten years and yes, Oxbridge graduates are unquestionably vastly more intelligent than average.

aristeides

You are, of course, entirely right and even the Labour party acknowledge this implicitly: every one of the candidates in their last leadership election went to Oxbridge. What on earth the problem with it is, god only knows.

sinosimon
  • 14:56 |
  • 26 May 2011
  • 0

with, of course, the caveat that rugby or rowing blues may be equivalent to a rather slow goldfish. but if you want something heavy lifting.........

land economy was the get out for the ..ahem..more intellectually negligible of the sporting crowd. as long as you could recognise and name a fence post you'd get a third, and if you beat oxford/cambridge (delete as applicable) everyone was happy.

andy

Rochdale is better than Oldham though. If you had just put a little more effort in, you might have got to Cambridge :)

AJC

I would surmise that very few "attended Oxford and Cambridge".

DS
  • 22:10 |
  • 26 May 2011
  • 0

"Where did you read?" what's does this mean and why is it offensive?

Tyranosaurus

DS - One "reads" at Oxford or Cambridge, elsewhere one "studies" ...

cif

Don't know why they're asking. Th readers are already on the case. You need RapidEddie's list: http://www.guardian.co.uk/discussion/comment-permalink/5450859 Alan Rusbridger – Magdalene College, Cambridge Alexander Chancellor – Trinity Hall, Cambridge Allegra Stratton – Emmanuel College, Cambridge Andrew Osborn – Oriel College, Oxford Andrew Rawnsley – Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge Ben Goldacre – Magdalen College, Oxford Bidisha Bandyopadhyay – St Edmund Hall, Oxford Catherine Bennett – Hertford College, Oxford Clare Armitstead – St Hilda's College, Oxford David Mitchell – Peterhouse, Cambridge David Shariatmadari – King's College, Cambridge Emily Bell – A. N. Other College, Oxford George Monbiot – Brasenose College, Oxford Hadley Freeman – St Anne's College, Oxford Ian Black – A.N. Other College, Cambridge Jackie Ashley – St Anne's College, Oxford Jane Martinson – A. N. Other College, Cambridge Janine Gibson – St John's College, Oxford John Harris – Queen's College, Oxford John Hooper – St Catharines College, Cambridge Jonathan Freedland – Wadham College, Oxford Madeleine Bunting – Corpus Christi College, Cambridge Marina Hyde – Christ Church, Oxford Martin Kettle – Balliol College, Oxford Martin Wainwright – Merton College, Oxford Melanie Phillips – St Anne's College, Oxford Nick Cohen – Hertford College, Oxford Paul Lewis – King's College, Cambridge Paul Sagar – Balliol College, Oxford Peter Bradshaw – A. N. Other College, Cambridge Peter Preston – St John's College, Oxford Polly Toynbee – St Anne's College, Oxford Riazat Butt – A. N. Other College, Oxford Richard Norton-Taylor – Hertford College, Oxford Rowenna Davis – Balliol College, Oxford Sam Leith – Magdalen College, Oxford Seumas Milne – Balliol College, Oxford Simon Hoggart – King's College, Cambridge Simon Jenkins – St John's College, Oxford Simon Tisdall – Downing College, Cambridge Tanya Gold – Merton College, Oxford Timothy Garton Ash – St. Antony's College, Oxford Victoria Coren – St Johns College, Oxford Zoe Williams – Lincoln College, Oxford


Be briefed for £1 a week...

PoliticsHome PRO Find out more