PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
- Sign up to see last 24 hours
-
PoliticsHome Services
- £1/Week PoliticsHome On the Go
-
PoliticsHome Services
- Hide
-
politicshomeuk | Ann Widdecombe: To say question of prayers before council meetings is a matter o...
- 22:08
- PoliticsHome
-
politicshomeuk | David Lammy: "Aggressive secularism" is taking over UK
- 22:07
- PoliticsHome
-
politicshomeuk | Sir Menzies Campbell on NHS Bill: I cannot understand the left's opposition to a...
- 21:24
- PoliticsHome
-
politicshomeuk | Andrew Cave of Federation of Small Businesses: Problem is not that banks aren't ...
- 20:48
- PoliticsHome
-
The increasingly-sanctimonious @BillGates lectures us on why the UK should give ...
- 18:37
- http://t.co/lLbjTtLG
-
-
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
- Sign up to see last 24 hours
-
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
- Sign up to see last 24 hours
-
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
- Sign up to see last 24 hours
-
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
- Sign up to see last 24 hours
-
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
- Sign up to see last 24 hours
-
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
- Sign up to see last 24 hours
-
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
- Sign up to see last 24 hours
-
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
- Sign up to see last 24 hours
-
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
- Sign up to see last 24 hours
-
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
- Sign up to see last 24 hours
-
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
- Sign up to see last 24 hours
-
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
- Sign up to see last 24 hours
-
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
- Sign up to see last 24 hours
-
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
- Sign up to see last 24 hours
-
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
- Sign up to see last 24 hours
-
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
- Sign up to see last 24 hours
-
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
- Sign up to see last 24 hours
-
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
- Sign up to see last 24 hours
-
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
- Sign up to see last 24 hours
Insider Research
Understanding the heart of Westminster
Friday 9th October 2009 | 13:52
Big government attack: the start of an ideological argument for cuts?
Three quarters of political insiders took Cameron's emphasis on 'big government' to be the start of a new ideological argument for spending cuts
Until yesterday, the official Conservative message on spending cuts was one of reluctant necessity.
Until last year, David Cameron had chosen to match Labour's spending plans and he only retreated from this position at the time of the financial crisis. The impression given was that the Conservatives were content to continue with the state in roughly its current size in spending terms, sharing the proceeds of growth between investment in public services and tax cuts. The shift in position over the past year was put down to the dire state of the public finances, which made painful decisions on spending unavoidable.
Yesterday however in David Cameron's speech to party conference, the phrase 'big government' appeared fourteen times. This was a crucial new emphasis, for the first time making explicit the idea that the problems of the past ten years derive from an oversized state.
Its corollary is that a smaller state would have been preferable, and it has been taken as the start of a new, ideological, argument for spending cuts. The theme has been well received by Conservative commentators, but will no doubt please Peter Mandelson, who accused the Tories in his conference speech of a "barely disguised glee" at the prospect of spending cuts.
73% of political insiders - as measured by the Phi100 panel of MPs and peers, journalists and thought leaders in think tanks and universities - thought David Cameron's emphasis was preparing the way for an ideological argument for spending cuts:
Strong majorities of all parties, including nonaligned observers, concluded the same.
Leave a comment...
Latest Insider Research
Latest PRO Contnet
On Air
Summaries and transcripts from TV and radio
Ann Widdecombe: Prayers before council meetings are 'quite proper'
52 minutes ago on Any Questions, BBC Radio 4
David Lammy: Aggressive secularism taking over UK
1 hour ago on Any Questions, BBC Radio 4
Sir Menzies Campbell: Left should support NHS reforms
1 hour ago on Any Questions, BBC Radio 4
Transcript
Speech by Ivan Lewis MP to the WWF/RGS seminar: “Navigating the perfect storm: the international challenge of food, water and energy security”
09/02/2012
Tim B
- or to put it another way: smaller government means people keeping their own money, and spending it according to their priorities, rather than the government confiscating it and using it for 'investment' - a travesty of a word meaning if ever there was one.