PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

- Sign up to see last 24 hours
PoliticsHome Services
PoliticsHome Services
Andreas Whittam Smith: Authenticity is a great asset in a leader.David Cameron l...
John Rentoul | The euro question Cameron won’t answer: I am baffled again as to what the Prime ...
Benedict Brogan | Evidence submitted to Parliament by former chief auditor at A4e reveals "systemi...
Kevin Maguire | Getting silly when a private school head accuses Clegg of Communism after a Tory...
YouGov | Update - Labour lead on 10: Latest YouGov/The Sun results 23rd May CON 32%, LAB ...
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers
Tuesday 10th November 2009 | 15:30
Yesterday, 56% of insiders believed the criticism of Gordon Brown over his misspelt letter was justified. Today, there has been a distinct shift in opinion, with 72% believing the attack has crossed the line, indicating that a second day of coverage and publication of the phone conversation means The Sun’s attack has gone too far.
Yesterday the newspaper printed the letter sent to Jacqui Janes after her son Jamie was killed in Afghanistan. Today, it has published a transcript of a telephone conversation between the Prime Minister and Ms Janes and again featured the story on its front page. It has been the most-covered political story across the mainstream media on both days.
72% of insiders believe the attack has crossed the line, compared to just 21% who believe it is legitimate journalism.
The Phi100 panel is comprised of MPs, peers, journalists, think tank leaders, academics and strategists from across all political leanings.
A right-wing strategist said, “This is utterly disgusting. I may be a Tory, but I take no joy from this. He did make the effort to write, he made the effort to phone. He clearly does care. And he is, like it or loathe it, our Prime Minister. This is unfair on Brown - a disgraceful and unwarranted attack. Not in my name!”
A journalist said, “The broadcast of the phone conversation was wrong, it made the entire thing seem like a sting.”
A left-aligned think tank leader said, “It is beneath contempt.”
Another left-leaning think tank leader said, “The cynical exploitation of this woman's loss is disgusting.”
A Liberal Democrat MP said, “It is legitimate but a bit unsavoury. There will be some sympathy for Brown, but he still covers over quite poorly in the transcript, and it vulnerable on the issue of equipment failures - not least helicopters.”
Furthermore, 61% of insiders said the continued attack on Mr Brown was more likely to make them him. Across the political spectrum, only right-aligned insiders were sceptical about defending the Prime Minister.
A journalist said, “It makes me more likely to defend him, because he was trying to do the decent thing. It's backfired and it's terrible for him.”
A Liberal Democrat MP said, “More likely, which is unusual - I'm not his biggest fan but I think the Sun are being completely unfair to him!”
A Conservative MP said it had not altered his opinion. “My sympathy for the way he's been treated is balanced out by my view that he has no understanding or sympathy for the armed forces - hence part of their current plight.”
Summaries and transcripts from TV and radio
2 hours ago on Newsnight, BBC Two
2 hours ago on Newsnight, BBC Two
23/05/2012 on BBC News
alan
When in a hole...stop digging!
The phone call made by Brown was to justify himself. He cannot EVER be wrong!
I applaud The Sun and for continuing with the story. Brown is an absolute disgrace. He was just going through the motions when scrawling that letter. I have no respect at all for this ghastly man and these pleaders on his behalf disgust me as well.
Never forget that this was the untimely murder of this brave young man. Equipment such as helicopters may well have saved his life. The fact is there IS a lack oh helicopters and men are being lost by the roadside bombs. Helicopters would mean safer patrolling. Brown is a disgrace and those who are 'protecting' him should be ashamed.
Barry Chuckle
I have very little time for Brown as a leader of the country and the Labour Party. The Sun's behaviour is disgraceful. It's going all out on Brown and instead of critiquing him legitimately it's crossing the line with a second day of coverage. This women's grief is being manipulated by a disgusting rag. Any criticism of the country's role in Afghanistan or the equipment they are getting should be confined to that, it's more than enough.
If Brown really wanted my vote he could squash Murdoch like a bug.
John
This is the man that employed Damian McBride.
Faye
Of course he didn't mean to upset - but that's what he always does.
It wasn't Brown's spelling or writing that angered me - it was the fact that he sent a condolence letter, of all things, with crossings out in it and the fact that he thought it was OK to send it like that.
The hole seems to be getting deeper IMO
Les
Don't forget Mrs Janes contacted the Sun not the other way round - they have reported factually IMO, just like other papers would have done given the chance.
She is not being manipulated, if anything she has manipulated the Sun - she is just very very angry.
It makes me laugh to hear Mandy say that the Sun is deliberately smearing Brown - you couldn't make it up - step forward McBride
Jonathan Cook
Jacqui only ever wanted an apology for the spelling mistakes. Gordon did not apologise. The story has no blown up into a row, when a simple apology would have killed the issue.
How many times have we seen this same pattern with Brown now?
David Parkin
The arrogance of The Sun knows no bounds. "It was The Sun wot won it". Sadly, there are still those who take notice of this worst example of the guttersnipe press
Bardirect
We seem to have lost sight of the fact that Mrs Janes initial grievance is that her son, like many others, died from injuries which would be survivable if it had not been for the lack of helicopters needed for evacuation, and the inept letter only compounded that, with Brown left trying to exculpate himself for both the lack of equipment and the letter.
It is Brown who crossed the lines by cutting the budgets needed to fight these wars, then lying about it, time and time again.
Alan
I think everyone should listen to Sky's interview with Mrs Janes - very interesting and in my view completely exonerates the Sun
Nigel
The Sun's attack on our Prime Minister is disgraceful. This is a private matter between Mrs Janes and him. For the Sun to stir in this way, as well as using taped conversations is disgusting. Murdoch's only aim is to undermine our democratic institutions and everyone should be telling him where to get off.
Johnny Norfolk
Its a fine time when the only way we can now get anything done is via the press. This Lady has done the lads a favour by doing this. Labour, Conservative and the liberals have done nothing to sort this out. With the BBC that should be in the forefront is just pulling its forelock to its Labour masters. This Lady and The Sun have done the right thing in showing just what kind of PM we have
alan
Isn't it rather strange that the respondents to this story are, bar one, against the results of your story.
It tells me that your 'insiders' are too much in the bubble of westminster and are as divorced from the feelings of the people, as Brown is!
Paul Hughes
I despise Brown with a passion. I cringe at his voice. I vomit at his slack-jawed expression. I treat his every word as if it is the most disgusting lie. I would truly truly truly be happy to see him hang for what he has done, for I see it as a result of catastrophic, myopic and single minded vandalism.
And so, when I find myself almost feeling sorry for him, despite his own use of the smear tactics now ranged against him, I feel well qualified to side with the "insiders." It has gone too far. Having said that, I hear he has called for a full report into the death of this soldier. I fully expect some doctor or other to pronounce that his injuries were not survivable. I fully expect this finding to be leaked to the press. Mrs Janes will probably be found to have committed some minor crime or personal indiscretion and her character, via snide innuendo, will be assassinated in turn. She has tackled the greatest political monster of the last hundred years. Her "treachery" will not be forgotten...
Emma
Whether you are Brown's biggest fan or most strident opponent, it is hard to see this story as anything but crass, callous and irresponsible journalism. The PM sends a handwritten letter of condolence and it becomes a stick to beat him with. Disappointingly typical of the negative, cynical and calculating media that we find ourselves manipulated by day in day out.
The death of a soldier is a tragic consequence of war. The dearth of adequate equipment is a tragic consequence of war and not having a limitless budget. Neither of these things are Brown's fault. Mrs Janes has suffered a life-shattering personal loss, but by her reprehensible dealings with the press (including taping a private phone call) belittle her own loss. I find the whole story an embarrassment to.