Feedback

The Live Wire

  • Andreas Whittam Smith: Authenticity is a great asset in a leader.David Cameron l...

    • source icon
    • 00:00
  • John Rentoul | The euro question Cameron won’t answer: I am baffled again as to what the Prime ...

    • source icon
    • 22:33
  • Benedict Brogan | Evidence submitted to Parliament by former chief auditor at A4e reveals "systemi...

    • source icon
    • 22:13
  • Kevin Maguire | Getting silly when a private school head accuses Clegg of Communism after a Tory...

    • source icon
    • 22:12
  • YouGov | Update - Labour lead on 10: Latest YouGov/The Sun results 23rd May CON 32%, LAB ...

    • source icon
    • 22:00
  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers


PH Opinion

PH Opinion

Views and comment from Westminster

Caroline Lucas: Tackling the UK’s alcohol problem

Caroline Lucas tells PoliticsHome why the Government needs to restrict the heavy discounting of alcohol.

Alcohol has become such a common feature of everyday life in Britain that it’s easy to underestimate the profound impact it can have on individuals, families and communities.

But from talking with constituents at my surgeries, and with health professionals, the police, Brighton council officials and alcohol campaign groups, I know that the scale of the problems associated with high alcohol consumption is enormous.

Excessive drinking is often a key factor in cases of violent disorder, antisocial behaviour, domestic violence, child abuse, rape and sexual assault. Nationally, far more young people die as a result of alcohol than knife crime every year, yet it rarely hits the headlines in quite the same way.

The costs of alcoholism in terms of lost productivity at work, together with the bill for criminal justice and health, are a vast burden on the budgets of local authorities and on public services across the country. In Brighton and Hove alone, home to my constituency, we face an annual bill of £100 million for dealing with the impact of alcohol abuse.

But while some great work is being done at the local level to open up a debate on the problem – the Alcohol Programme Board’s Big Alcohol Debate which kicked off in Brighton earlier this month, for example – we are not seeing any real progress on an effective national alcohol strategy.

The Government’s approach to alcohol pricing, for instance, has been nothing short of complacent. The Coalition agreement in May 2010 pledged to "ban the selling of alcohol below cost price", yet when proposals for a minimum price were introduced by Conservative Home Office minister James Brokenshire in January 2011, it was so low as to have virtually no effect.

An investigation by the Guardian into the plans to bar the sale of alcohol at below the cost of duty and VAT found that this would only have stopped one cut-price drink deal out of thousands in a three month period. It also revealed that promotional offers such as a Tesco deal of 24 cans of Fosters for £10, or three 15-packs of Strongbow – 89 units of alcohol – for £20, would not have been affected at all.

The Motion I’ve put down this week directly targets this kind of ultra low priced alcohol in supermarkets and off licenses which fuels our binge drinking culture. Pricing measures to prevent irresponsible retailers from offering heavily discounted drink – often bought in bulk for ‘pre-loading’ before a night out – which would also alleviate the pressure on the licensed trade and help to protect local pubs from closure.

I’m also calling on the Treasury to close a loophole which allows super strength white cider – sometimes sold cheaper than bottled water – to dodge the stricter tax regime that applies to high strength beer. Professionals working with homeless and dependent street drinkers, as well as young ‘at-risk’ drinkers, have long expressed concern that white cider has a particularly damaging effect on the health and behaviour of the people they work with.

There is no reason why the new tax rates for high strength beers, which took effect from 1 October, should not apply to high strength ciders as well.

I believe that such measures, together with more control over licensing for local authorities, can help reduce the long term financial burden of dealing with serious alcohol abuse – and end the misery of those whose lives are blighted by it.

Caroline Lucas is a member of the All Party Parliamentary Group for Drug and Alcohol Harm Reduction.


Leave a comment...

gareth
  • 20:32 |
  • 21 Oct 2011
  • 0

Why attack low price alcohol? Hard working people like me and my partner enjoy a glass of wine a couple of nights a week! We buy buy one get one half price on bottles of Wine. We dont drink until we are unconscious and vomit on high streets before starting fights and then come home. No, we have a few bottles of wine a week (usually five). Now we dont earn that much so these offers allow us to have a relaxing glass or two a couple of nights a week. It's easy for MPs on £60k+ a year to buy £20 bottles of wine like they're nothing but for me and my partner £20 is what we spend on 2 or 3 bottles in the first place. This is wrong! plain and simple - its the well off MPs and the media types attacking working class or lower middle-class folk who buy drinks on offer because they're cheap. It's the usual nonsense but what do we expect from Ms Lucas eh?

Evelinev

Gareth, I don't think Caroline Lucas is attacking the relatively cheap bottles of wine that you or I are drinking. What she is talking about is the white cider that is often cheaper than water, the ridiculous deals on beer, the loss leaders that bring people in. Just read what she says.

Those deals cost us, you and me, lots of money in paying for the damage of binge drinking. It is also one of the reasons we see pubs closing all over the country. The unfair advantage of supermarkets may bring them big profits, but in the end we all pay for them.

Jonathan Chilvers
  • 12:57 |
  • 24 Oct 2011
  • 0

Well said. I work in homelessness and unlike most other forms of alcohol I have never met anyone who buys a bottle of superstrength cider or beer to enjoy unless it is to feed an addiction. All too often the result is the drinker gets exploited and assaulted whilst also becoming aggressive / destructive themselves before ending up in A&E at great cost to the tax payer. It's telling that as a first step to addressing consumption that we suggest that people only drink 'normal strength' and the effect within a few days is significant. Superstrength cider and beer is a blight on our society and should be priced out completely.

Льюис Гривс
  • 18:54 |
  • 24 Oct 2011
  • 0

But drinking is so good...

Philly
  • 09:19 |
  • 25 Nov 2011
  • 0

As Chailre Sheen says, this article is “WINNING!”

Madge
  • 14:29 |
  • 25 Nov 2011
  • 0

Always the best cotnnet from these prodigious writers.

Dasia
  • 02:29 |
  • 28 Nov 2011
  • 0

Please keep thrownig these posts up they help tons.


Latest Videos & Audio