Feedback

The Live Wire

  • Resolution backed by all non-permanent members: India,Colombia,South Africa,Germ...

    • source icon
    • 18:41
  • Solidarity with #Russian democracy & left activists against #Putin autocracy & #...

    • source icon
    • 18:40
  • I welcome the principled stand of all the other members of the Security Council ...

    • source icon
    • 18:35
  • Russia + China veto is an hour of shame for UN. They have twice blocked Security...

    • source icon
    • 18:31
  • Oh, Syria. Awful. Predictable. I hope we don't find out what would have happened...

    • source icon
    • 17:53
  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers


PoliticsHome Polls

PoliticsHome Polls

Public opinion today

Voters: shielding services more important than reducing deficit

The public believe that deep cuts in public spending from the next government would be a greater worry than failing to reduce the deficit quickly enough.

More voters are worried about the next government cutting spending too deeply than failing to reduce the £178 billion public deficit fast enough, new PoliticsHome research has revealed.

1,082 voters were asked to say whether their greater worry about the next government was that it would cut public spending too deeply, or that it would fail to reduce the budget deficit quickly enough. 

Forty per cent of people were more concerned that state services would be cut back too deeply. Meanwhile, only twenty five per cent said that their greater fear was that the deficit would not be tackled with sufficient speed.

Political parties are arguing over the rate at which the deficit needs to be reduced, weighing the need for the government to pay back its debts against the effect that raising taxes or cutting spending may have on the economic recovery. Which of the following possibilities is a greater worry for you about what the next government (whichever party forms it) might do after the election?

The Conservatives have argued that the deficit must be paid back as quickly as feasibly possible, to safeguard Britain’s economic health, while Labour has warned that cutting public spending too deeply will damage services and could tip Britain back into recession.

Floating Voters

Voters not aligned to any party are especially sceptical that the priority should be to pay back the deficit quickly. Only sixteen per cent were more worried that debt reduction would be too slow. Meanwhile, more than double – thirty six per cent – are more concerned about the effect of a spending squeeze on public services.

Political parties are arguing over the rate at which the deficit needs to be reduced, weighing the need for the government to pay back its debts against the effect that raising taxes or cutting spending may have on the economic recovery. Which of the following possibilities is a greater worry for you about what the next government (whichever party forms it) might do after the election?

PoliticsHome interviewed 1,082 adults from 26-28 February 2010.  Results are weighted by age, gender and political party identification to reflect the population of Great Britain.  Full data tables are available on request.

Leave a comment...

Mucker

Result to be expected as the public do not remember what happens when the deficit is too high and mainy do not really understand the deficit issue. Failure of the parties to put it into simple terms, like do you want Greek (not making the cuts and having rising interest rates) or Ireland (making the cuts and keeping interest rates down)?

DW@Wolds

Someone needs to be telling the public a few home truths and introduce them to the harsh economic realities.

john shervell

what any goverment should do is be honest and admit that the pay ,pensions,redundence payments,sick pay, and holidays of all the public sector are vastly better then the private and will redress the balance as soon as possible!!!!

George Woodhouse

The problem is that we have become, in the main, a country where we do not think about debt or the consequences of it. Some of us realise that too much debt is a bad thing and that eventually someone has to pay it back. Maybe its the word "somebody" - as in "somebody else" that is the key to understanding this attitude.

Russell

The public sector does not generate wealth. Yes we do need public services. but when you consider that in one town 1 in 3 people are employed through public services it means that the the other 2 people taxes are paying for them. A little simplistic I know but it needs to be explained in simplistic terms to the electorate. Only investment in the wealth generating areas of the economy will get it the UK back up and running sooner.

David Dee

On the one hand tha tory party argue that deep cuts are required immediately if we are to continue to recover. However, despite his being given every opportunity to withdraw his IHT proposals, which would give massive tax benefits in excess of £500,000 to the already wealthy (familiies such as Cameron's and Osborne's) Cameron has not yet seen fit to withdraw this proposed handout to millionaires. Does he mean deep cuts for the less well off and rewards for the wealthy ?? And he wonders why he is not trusted !!

Eric Jackson

Public services are already scheduled to be cut as Councils respond to the new situation. Any deeper cuts too soon would have the jobless queues snaking round the Job Centres. And to suggest that the private sector is the only money spinner and contributor to taxation is farcical! Every pound spent is taxed, including for those on benefit, the retired and those in public service, the latter two also paying tax on everything they receive. As a lifelong public servant, my tax was taken at source throogh PAYE. I had no unprincipled accountant to doctor my tax return. The 2:1 tax ratio mentioned is an unfortunate myth bandied about by those who understand only their own selfishness. We need to invest in public works now so that the infrastructure is improved for all of us, and provide employment which will boost the economy through the building industry. Those banks that caused this mess should be forced to lend at good rates in order to kickstart the recovery, not harbour cash to satisfy shareholders: they owe us.

Eric Jackson
  • 16:13 |
  • 02 Mar 2010
  • 0

Public services are already scheduled to be cut as Councils respond to the new situation. Any deeper cuts too soon would have the jobless queues snaking round the Job Centres. And to suggest that the private sector is the only money spinner and contributor to taxation is farcical! Every pound spent is taxed, including for those on benefit, the retired and those in public service, the latter two also paying tax on everything they receive. As a lifelong public servant, my tax was taken at source throogh PAYE. I had no unprincipled accountant to doctor my tax return. The 2:1 tax ratio mentioned is an unfortunate myth bandied about by those who understand only their own selfishness. We need to invest in public works now so that the infrastructure is improved for all of us, and provide employment which will boost the economy through the building industry. Those banks that caused this mess should be forced to lend at good rates in order to kickstart the recovery, not harbour cash to satisfy shareholders: they owe us.

BGarvie

The accumulated national debt so far exceeds £850 BILLION. This year the debt alone to run this government is approaching £180 Billion. The annual interest exceeds the whole defence budget. If it is not restructured for reducuction, our currency will become worthless through inflation. Losing our AAA rating will increase interest rates alarmingly and that will set in chain a set of events of frightening proportions. Thousands of companies will collapse and unemployment will mushroom at a catastrophic rate never seen before. You could expect 6 million plus unemployed. Public sector debt caused by this dysfunctional Government must be tackled as a matter of utmost priority.



Latest on this story

  • |

Latest on
Public Sector Finances