Feedback

The Live Wire

  • I welcome the principled stand of all the other members of the Security Council ...

    • source icon
    • 18:35
  • Russia + China veto is an hour of shame for UN. They have twice blocked Security...

    • source icon
    • 18:31
  • Oh, Syria. Awful. Predictable. I hope we don't find out what would have happened...

    • source icon
    • 17:53
  • Dan Hannan | On my way to East Claydon, Bucks, for anti-HS2 meeting with James Elles. We've f...

    • source icon
    • 17:41
  • Alex Forrest | Hague says of China and Russia: their approach lets the Syrian people down. Wil...

    • source icon
    • 17:36
  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers


PoliticsHome Polls

PoliticsHome Polls

Public opinion today

Strong public scepticism over Cameron calls for reform

By a heavy majority, voters believe that David Cameron would be less radical in office than his speech yesterday implied

David Cameron yesterday called for a ‘massive, sweeping, radical redistribution of power’ in the country, arguing that it was time for citizens and parliament to claw back some control from the state. 

But the public are highly sceptical over whether he would be quite so bold if he actually became Prime Minister.  Overall, a strong seventy per cent majority felt that Cameron’s actions in office would be more cautious than his recent speech suggests. 

Under a quarter (twenty three per cent) reckoned that he would carry through with such a radical redistribution of power.

The only group who felt that Cameron would live up to his words on gaining power were Conservative supporters, and even these only by the slender margin of fifty four to forty four.

Non-aligned voters - often looked to for underlying attitudes free of partisan bias - were strongly sceptical.  Seventy two per cent felt that Cameron would not be so radical as Prime Minister.

Labour and Liberal Democrat supporters showed an even stronger conviction that Cameron would show greater caution than his speech suggests.  Almost ninety per cent of these groups were sceptical about Cameron’s calls for reform. 

David Cameron has called for a 'massive, sweeping, radical redistribution of power: from the state to citizens; from the government to parliament; from Whitehall to communities; from the EU to Britain; from judges to the people; from bureaucracy to democracy.'

Do you think that if David Cameron became Prime Minister, he would carry through such a radical redistribution of power, or would he be more cautious than this?

PoliticsHome interviewed 1,178 adults by email between 26 - 27 May 2009. Results are weighted by party ID to reflect the UK.

Leave a comment...

oldrightie
  • 11:43 |
  • 27 May 2009
  • 0

The evidence is?

Benny Austwick, UWIC CF Chairman

That's the reason Labour supporters support Labour and Conservative supporters support the Conservatives. Cons believe Cameron will do this whereas Labourites don't. When he does, he'll win a lot more voters.

Iain

typical opposition leader speech close to elections promise the earth then free load when in power.

Brian

Actions not words - Given his approach to calls for an EU referendum how can Cameron be trusted to deliver. Its clear what people want!

Bill Holden

Politicians of all colours will be speaking about anything and everything in an attempt to push the expences issue down the news agenda. Because news is often gathered from a limited pools of sources it is possible that they will achieve their aim. We as the electorate must keep bringing the argument back to the corruption that infests the open wound at the heart of the mother of all parliaments. Real Democracy died so long ago that it is hard to see even historic vestages of real political freedom.

OldCrow

Daniel Finkelstein's comment to-day has it about spot on. Sadly. David Cameron's speech about reforming Parliament was a suprb speech, almost revolutionary. Just wish I could believe it would happen, I mean, I really want to believe.

Richard64

Cameron will slither his way out of it. It is like his (and Osbourn's) constant references to "we cannot say until we see the books..." which is nonsense. There are no secret "books", but it is a convenient phrase to mean "when we get in power we will do something different to that which we promised".

Ed
  • 20:14 |
  • 27 May 2009
  • 0

You know full well that there is no chance that Gordon Brown would ever allow any such release of power to the masses (his control freakery would never allow it), whatever he says.  There is at least a good chance that David Cameron means what he says

Roy

Unless you have lived through a Conservative government then you realise both the Tories and Labour promise the earth until they get in power.

Brian

Cameron has never been a minister (or run anything come to that) and even if he is sincere now (which, frankly, I doubt) he will change his mind once in office and wanting to decide things for himself. He gives no impression of a man wanting to give power to others - he leads the Conservatives from the front, it is always him, not his colleagues, on TV speaking for the Conservatives. His whole style is presidential not collegiate.

Sharon

David Cameron will not be good to run this country the evidence shows in the tactics he has used against is opposition he will be the wrong candidate during these times he will only make things worse.

David Graham

Regardinf D camerons comment on "all women" contstituencies, what a stupid idea!   Let women stand by all means but equally let the voters constiituency decide for themselves who and what sex the nominated candidate will be.  Do not tell the voters who to vote for, let them decide-male or female. We had enough of Blairs Babes during the last 12 years.,

H I Manning
  • 12:45 |
  • 11 May 2010
  • 0

I feel that this democracy is a failed experiment. The politicians we despise are but a reflection of ourselves. We would be better off with an amoral dictator with a strong sense of commitment to his vested interest and a firm sense of direction. I detest Mandelson but regard him as a man with the ability and coldness of heart to undemocratically lead us through troubled times Such a period of Government MIGHT encourage the electorate to grow up and put Civic Duty before civil rights.

Joan
  • 21:52 |
  • 09 Sep 2010
  • 0

I think David Cameron would follow through. It's about time we had some radical change. It's needed.



Latest on
US News