Menu
Fri, 19 April 2024

Newsletter sign-up

Subscribe now
The House Live All
Home affairs
Rt Hon Rachel Reeves Mais lecture hits the nail on the head for construction. Partner content
Communities
By Baroness Fox
Home affairs
Historic wins, inspiring moments and British success: MPs share what they’re looking forward at the Paris Olympics Partner content
By UK Sport
Communities
Veterans falling victim to plague of process  Partner content
Communities
Press releases
By UK Sport

Former Archbishop of Canterbury supports calls for inquiry into assisted dying law

Dignity in Dying

4 min read Partner content

Lord Carey of Clifton makes intervention as ground-breaking new survey of doctors’ views launches this week.


The Rt Rev and Rt Hon Lord Carey of Clifton has today backed calls for a government review into assisted dying. He joins calls for a review of the functioning of the existing law from across society, including from half of Police and Crime Commissioners and from MPs of all parties, including those who are not supportive of the full legalisation of assisted dying.

Lord Carey’s support for an inquiry mirrors the official position of the Church of England, which in 2014 called for a royal commission on assisted dying. This was backed by senior clergy including the Archbishop of York, John Sentamu, during debates in the House of Lords on Lord Falconer’s Assisted Dying Bill.

Yesterday saw the opening of the largest ever survey of doctors’ views on assisted dying as the British Medical Association conducts a poll of its membership for the first time. It will ask the union’s 160,000 members for their personal views on assisted dying and for their opinion on what official position the BMA should hold on the legalisation of assisted dying. It has been officially opposed to a change in the law since 2006.

In an article for the British Medical Journal, also published today, Lord Carey said:

“I want to send the message that we live in a compassionate society which has the courage to confront complexity, not one that bases its rules on fear or misunderstanding. I have observed a shift in pace in this debate in recent years. I meet far more people of faith who share my views. In Parliament there is growing acceptance that change is needed. History will no doubt conduct a forensic examination of how the assisted dying debate unfolded. I would not wish to see doctors criticised for being the last group defending a status quo many now recognise is leading to great suffering.”

In support of an inquiry, Lord Carey says:

“There have been numerous cases over the past few years that have shown to me that the law we have at the moment does not offer dying people the best possible ends to their lives. This is clear when we look at the experiences of people like Ann Whaley or Mavis Eccleston, who are being criminalised simply for helping their dying loved ones to have the deaths that they want. This is not the sign of a truly compassionate society and it is time for a full and frank reflection on what the ban on assisted dying means for people at the ends of their life and for their loving families. An independent inquiry would provide that. ”

Sarah Wootton, Chief Executive of Dignity in Dying, welcomed Lord Carey’s intervention:

“Lord Carey is right to support an inquiry into the way the law on assisted dying is working at the moment. It is significant that this has also been the position of the Church of England, which recommended that the subject be referred to a Royal Commission in 2014 during debates on Lord Falconer’s Assisted Dying Bill. It is increasingly clear that the blanket ban on assisted dying is not working well for dying people, their families, or for the public servants who must enforce it. The Government has indicated that it is listening keenly to requests for a review of the law and we believe this is a sensible and compassionate way forward.

“After all, an inquiry should satisfy those on all sides of this debate: anybody who suggests the current law works should welcome the opportunity to see this claim borne out by evidence; those of us who believe the law is failing want to be able to shed light on how the law affects dying people and their families. There can only be one reason why there might be resistance to a review of the law; that the Government and opponents of law change lack confidence that the law is working as intended.”

Categories

Home affairs