Menu
Fri, 29 March 2024

Newsletter sign-up

Subscribe now
The House Live All
Environment
Ethical and sustainable conservation can’t be achieved with endangered animals in hunters’ cross-hairs Partner content
Environment
By Earl Russell
Environment
Environment
Environment
Press releases

Rising number of pet thieves across Britain must face real justice

3 min read

Scottish Conservative and Unionist MP Ross Thomson writes ahead of his Ten Minute Rule Motion later today on pet theft.


We are well known as a nation of pet lovers, so it should come as no surprise to hear that more than 100,000 Britons have signed a petition calling for changes to the law around pet theft.

Some of the stories are absolutely heart-breaking.

Consider Dawn Maw, who spent thousands of pounds, took an extended period of time off work and suffered the breakdown of her marriage after her dog Angel was stolen in 2013.

Or the case of Kieren Hamilton, who was stabbed 40 times in a burglary in which his dog Rambo was stolen. According to his mother, he just wants his dog back.

For many people, it can be hard to truly comprehend the impact that losing a pet can have.

These animals are an integral part of the families that look after them, or indispensable companions to those who may live alone.

As things stand, the law does not recognise a pet as being any different to any other inanimate possession of the same value.

But a pet is not something you can simply replace.

If your phone is stolen, a new one that looks identical will arrive within 24 hours.

The loss of an animal can have a real and lasting impact on people’s lives.

That’s why I want to see the law tightened up to make pet theft a serious, criminal and punishable offence that recognises the status and importance of these animals.

That means amending the Animal Welfare Act 2005 and the Animal Health and Welfare (Scotland) Act 2006 to make the theft of pets an offence in its own right.

In England and Wales, sentencing guidelines are based primarily around the financial value of the possession, whether it be a mobile phone, a TV, or a beloved family pet.

This situation has led to light-touch sentences for pet thieves who have wreaked havoc on victims’ lives.

It is not much better in Scotland, where pet theft is not an offence in its own right either.

Since the Scottish Sentencing Council has no guidelines for pet theft, judges rely on past precedent when deciding on sentencing.

Very often, that means the same thing. Offenders are not being held accountable in the way that pet owners and animal lovers would want them to be.

Without meaningful punishment, it is difficult to see what the deterrent would be for any would-be thief.

This certainly seems to be a problem on the increase.

Recent findings published by Direct Line Pet Insurance, using UK police statistics, show an upward trend in pet thefts in recent years, with a 14% rise in 2016 and a further 6.8% increase in 2017

Last year, 61 French bulldogs were stolen – a 27% rise year on year, while Staffies remain the most targeted dog with 210 stolen in 2017.

A change in the law could have a significant impact on these figures.

My intention is that this Bill effect these necessary changes across Great Britain – in England and Wales, but also in Scotland.

The law on this is flawed in both jurisdictions, and as a Scottish MP, it is deeply important to me that pet owners in Aberdeen get as much support from the criminal justice system as pet owners in Abingdon or Aberavon.

So I hope to work with the Scottish Parliament, and in particular my Scottish Conservative colleague Maurice Golden MSP, to get legislative consent in Holyrood for this Bill, so pet thieves all over Great Britain face real justice.

This is an excellent opportunity for Holyrood and Westminster to work together for positive change, and I hope that happens.

Ross Thomson is the Conservative MP for Aberdeen South

PoliticsHome Newsletters

Get the inside track on what MPs and Peers are talking about. Sign up to The House's morning email for the latest insight and reaction from Parliamentarians, policy-makers and organisations.

Categories

Environment