GMB launches fresh legal challenge against Addison Lee in Uber-style workers' status case
3 min read
Union claims Addison Lee shirking its responsibilities through bogus self-employment.
GMB, the union for private hire drivers, has launched a fresh legal challenge against Addison Lee seeking confirmation of members’ worker status in another bogus self-employment case.
The hearing begins on July 4 at the Central London employment tribunal.
The test case brought by the GMB involves three Addison Lee drivers represented by law firm Leigh Day.
GMB asserts the drivers are workers and therefore entitled to the national minimum wage and holiday pay - benefits they are currently denied.
In October, GMB represented by Leigh Day won a similar ground-breaking victory against Uber.
The ruling of the Tribunal in the Uber case establishes that drivers are entitled to be paid at least the national minimum wage and holiday pay amongst other benefits.
This landmark case has major implications for more than 30,000 drivers across England and Wales.
Uber is currently appealing the decision in the employment appeal tribunal, which is due to be heard in September.
Maria Ludkin, GMB Legal Director, said:
“Addison Lee is shirking its responsibilities through bogus self-employment.
“Addison Lee drivers work for Addison Lee and are entitled to the same basic rights and benefits as workers in other industries.
“GMB continues to fight for the rights of our members wherever we see exploitation disguised as bogus self-employment.”
Liana Wood, representing the drivers for Leigh Day, said:
“Addison Lee currently denies that its drivers are entitled to the most basic of workers’ rights.
"They argue that drivers do not work for Addison Lee but instead work for themselves and are self-employed.
“On behalf of our clients we will claim that Addison Lee is wrongly classifying its drivers as self-employed with the result that drivers are denied the rights and protections that they were lawfully intended them to have, including the right to not have their contracts terminated because they are members of a trade union.
“We will argue that Addison Lee exerts significant control over its drivers in order to provide a highly trained and vetted driving service to the public.
"If Addison Lee wishes to operate in this way, and to reap the substantial benefits, then it must acknowledge its responsibilities towards those drivers as workers.
“This claim is vital for the thousands of Addison Lee drivers who work in England and Wales and has implications even wider than that.
"We are seeing a creeping erosion of employment rights as companies misclassify their workers as self-employed so as to avoid paying them holiday pay and the national minimum wage.”
