Login to access your account

Tue, 14 July 2020

Personalise Your Politics

Subscribe now
The House Live All
New appointments this week in UK politics, the civil service and public affairs Member content
Home affairs
Operationally led, digitally enabled: A fresh approach to transforming legacy border systems Member content
Home affairs
Multi-year funding settlement needed to rescue policing Member content
Home affairs
Press releases

Bar Council sounds warning over prospect of employment tribunal fees return

Bar Council

2 min read Member content

The prospect that people may again be charged fees to use employment tribunals has been met with concern in the legal profession.

Ministry of Justice (MoJ) Permanent Secretary, Richard Heaton, confirmed yesterday before the Justice Select Committee that ministers are working on a new scheme for employment tribunal fees, following the Supreme Court’s 2017 decision to strike down the previous fee scheme as unlawful.

Chair of the Bar Council, Andrew Walker QC, said: “People in need of justice have enough hurdles to overcome already.  Many of those who need employment tribunals have been unfairly dismissed or discriminated against.  It is disappointing that the Government is yet again spending time working out how to charge them to bring such claims, particularly in the absence of legal aid for most of these claims.  This can only serve to undermine yet further the rights of those with legitimate grievances against their employer.”

Research published last week from Professor Martin Chalkley reveals that as taxpayer financing has declined, the MoJ has become increasingly reliant on other sources of income, with a “substantial part of the burden” falling on those paying fees to use courts and tribunals.

Between 2008 and 2018, overall justice funding fell by 27 per cent in real terms. That 27 per cent fall was reduced to 20 per cent by a huge increase in income from other sources: a 58 per cent increase in cash terms, 34 per cent in real terms.  That has included an increase of 27 per cent in aggregate court fees.

Andrew Walker QC said: “Our experience with the last employment tribunal fee scheme has proved that fees deter deserving and meritorious claims.  Those who cannot afford to pay a fee to use our justice system are no less deserving than those who can.

“As the Supreme Court has made abundantly clear, justice is not a service bought by individuals for their private benefit, nor should it be treated in this way.  An accessible and effective justice system is crucial for the whole of society, underpinning all of our economic and social relationships.  While modest fees may be permissible in principle, so long as full access to justice is maintained, a ‘user must pay’ philosophy is not.

“In light of the further cuts to the Ministry’s funding confirmed in last week’s budget, and our Justice Week survey results showing that such cuts are out of step with public opinion, the Government urgently needs to change tack, to place a proper public value on justice, and to fund it sustainably from the public purse.”



Home affairs
Associated Organisation
Partner content
NHS Parliamentary Awards

The NHS Parliamentary Awards sponsored by Fujifilm are a chance for all MPs in England to celebrate the outstanding care they and their constituents receive.

Find out more