Menu

Login to access your account

Thu, 9 April 2020

Personalise Your Politics

Subscribe now
The House Live All
Could the delay of COP26 impact climate ambitions? Member content
Providing a critical service to keep you safe, warm and connected during Covid-19 Member content
Coronavirus
Coronavirus
Press releases

Boris Johnson faces Commons rebellion over coronavirus emergency powers bill

Boris Johnson faces Commons rebellion over coronavirus emergency powers bill
2 min read

Boris Johnson is facing a House of Commons rebellion over a bill giving the Government emergency powers to tackle the coronavirus.

The legislation, which will be rushed through Parliament next week, would give police the power to detain suspected carriers of the virus for a month, while also relaxing care standards so local authorities can prioritise resources.

Under the Government's plans, the new law would be on the statute book for two years, with ministers having the power to either shorten or lengthen that timetable by six months.

Ministers had hoped the bill would win cross-party support and be passed without a vote.

But former Tory Cabinet minister and civil liberties campaigner David Davis has tabled an amendment calling for the legislation to expire after a year.

He told The Times: "There is nobody who can scrutinise a 300-page bill in one day.

"The Government itself will have made mistakes, it’s a fact of life. We need an absolute, brick-wall stop on this legislation at 12 months."

Labour MP Chris Bryant has also said he will try to amend the bill so that MPs get a vote on it every 90 days.

Writing for The House Live, he said: "Nobody will balk at many of these measures – especially where the Government is bringing in support for families, individuals and businesses. But some of these powers are draconian and impinge on people’s liberty.

"Yes, they may be necessarily draconian and yes, the Government understandably wants to have every tool for tackling the virus to hand.

"But it’s a rule throughout history that governments – even good governments – are quick to take extra powers to themselves and slow to return them."

He added: "The powers in this bill that confer an additional benefit to people could stand for two years without explicit renewal, but any measure that restricts liberty should be subject to a renewal clause so that at the very least Parliament has a moment to consider whether they are still needed.

"I would prefer that to be every 30 days, but I accept there may be an argument for an initial period of 90 days followed by regular renewals every 30 days."

The bill was introduced to Parliament last week and MPs will begin their scrutiny of it on Monday.

Read the most recent article written by Kevin Schofield - MPs given £10,000 extra to help them work from home during coronavirus outbreak

Categories

Coronavirus Health
Partner content
The Future of Health

What does the future of healthcare look like? Health professionals, experts and Parliamentarians scan the horizon and find cause for optimism

Find out more

The House Magazine
The House Magazine

Read the latest issue of Parliament's weekly magazine, featuring Lindsay Hoyle, Emily Thornberry, Tom Tugendhat, Tobias Ellwood, Robert Halfon, Jess Phillips, Rosena Allin-Khan and more

Read now