Charities need right rules to run effectively - report
Changes to the law could help charities run more effectively, according to the Law Commission.
In a new report – Technical Issues in Charity Law – published today, the Commission says that problems in charity law prevent or delay legitimate charitable activities, discourage people from volunteering, and force charities to obtain professional advice that should not be necessary.
As a result the independent law reform body has recommended changes to remove unnecessary bureaucracy whilst ensuring proper protections for the public, who donate around £9.7billion each year.
Law Commissioner Professor Nick Hopkins said:
“Charities are a force for good and millions regularly donate to help others. But the rules that govern them have to be right.
“As it is, some of the technical law around charities is inefficient and unduly complex.
“Our reforms would help make sure charities use their time and money in the best way to support their good causes, whilst providing oversight to ensure public confidence.”
Putting the right rules in place
Charities are set up in a number of different ways, each with their own legal requirements.
There are around 167,000 charities in England and Wales registered with the Charity Commission, the regulator, as well as thousands of unregistered charities. Registered charities alone have a combined annual income of over £74 billion.
But many charities struggle with a range of technical issues in the law, which causes them unnecessary expense and prevents them dedicating their full resources to the public good.
Alongside this, the law does not provide the Charity Commission with all of the tools it needs to promote public trust in charities.
As a result, the Technical Issues in Charity Law report makes a number of recommendations to maximise the efficient use of charitable funds whilst ensuring proper safeguards for the public.
For charities, recommendations include:
- giving charities more flexibility to obtain tailored advice when they sell land, and removing unnecessary administrative burdens
- changes to the law to help charities amend their governing documents more easily with Charity Commission oversight where appropriate
- increased flexibility to use their permanent endowment, with checks in place to ensure its protection in the long term
- removing legal barriers to charities merging, when a merger is in their best interests
- giving trustees advance assurance that litigation costs in the Charity Tribunal can be paid from the charity’s funds
For the Charity Commission recommendations include:
- bringing in a single set of criteria to decide changes to a charity’s purposes
- increased powers to prevent charities using misleading names
- the ability to confirm that trustees were properly appointed
The reforms will save charities a large amount of time, as well as save costs. Those costs savings include an estimated £2.8m per year from increased flexibility concerning sales of land.
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts, who chaired the 2012 review of the Charities Act welcomed the review. He said:
“In my 2012 official review of the Charities Act 2006, I found that charities faced a number of historic obstacles under the current law. These unnecessary burdens on trustees act like barnacles on a boat, causing a drag when all should be plain sailing.
“Today's report from the Law Commission is important. Although its recommendations may appear to be highly technical, cumulatively I believe they would have a huge impact on the sector, helping trustees to work effectively in modern-day conditions.
"Since the recommendations have now been consulted on extensively and are approved of by the sector, I hope the government will find time to implement them speedily.”
Nicola Evans, Charities Counsel at Bircham Dyson Bell LLP, who chaired the Charity Law Association’s main working party response to the Commission, also welcomed the report, saying:
“As the Law Commission’s report today notes, its recommendations are technical but important, with real practical consequences for charities. It offers a real opportunity to remove some of the complexity and inconsistencies which can make charity law difficult both to apply and to regulate.
“I hope the Government will now bring forward the draft Bill to implement some much needed reform.”