Menu
Sat, 20 April 2024

Newsletter sign-up

Subscribe now
The House Live All
Home affairs
Rt Hon Rachel Reeves Mais lecture hits the nail on the head for construction. Partner content
Communities
By Baroness Fox
Home affairs
Historic wins, inspiring moments and British success: MPs share what they’re looking forward at the Paris Olympics Partner content
By UK Sport
Communities
Veterans falling victim to plague of process  Partner content
Communities
Press releases
By UK Sport

New reforms to ensure UK retains position as a leader in international arbitration

Law Commission

3 min read Partner content
  • Law Commission publishes proposals to update landmark Arbitration Act 1996 following its 25th anniversary
  • Improvements to the law designed to keep UK at the forefront of international dispute resolution
  • Views sought from legal experts, industry and the public in new consultation

The Law Commission of England and Wales has today [Thursday 22 September 2022] unveiled new proposals to update the Arbitration Act 1996, to ensure that the UK continues to be the foremost destination for international arbitration.

Arbitration, which involves parties resolving a dispute privately through a third party rather than the traditional court process, is a major industry in the UK.

Centred around the world-leading seat of London, arbitration in the UK commonly involves commercial disputes – but it can also involve other areas, such as family law.  

Over 25 years on from the establishment of the Act, the Law Commission has today concluded that it still functions very well, and that its central provisions should remain unchanged.  

To help strengthen the UK’s position as an arbitration leader, the Commission has also proposed a set of improvements, designed to make the Act as effective and responsive as possible, following recent reforms by competing jurisdictions.

The new proposals include measures to improve the efficiency of cases, give further protections to arbitrators, grant extra provisions to the courts to support cases, and refine the process for challenging an arbitrator and their decisions.

In other areas, including provisions on confidentiality and impartiality, the Commission proposes that current provisions are retained, on the grounds that the law is already effective and proportionate.  

Commenting on the arbitration proposals, Professor Sarah Green, the Law Commissioner for Commercial and Common Law, said:

“The Arbitration Act was a landmark piece of legislation which helped to propel London to its position as the foremost destination for international arbitration today.

“While it continues to function well, over 25 years later, some parts of the Act may benefit from being updated and refined.  

“Our proposals are designed to ensure that arbitration law is efficient, effective and responsive to modern developments. By making further improvements, we can help the UK to consolidate its status as a global centre for international dispute resolution.”

Lord Bellamy KC, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Justice, said:

“The UK has long been the world’s best destination for arbitration, and the Arbitration Act 1996 is internationally regarded as the gold standard of arbitration legislation. After a quarter century of success, it is right that the Law Commission is looking at the Act to ensure that the legislation remains relevant in the 21st century.

“The work of the Law Commission and those who contribute to this consultation will ensure that the Act remains world-leading for many years to come.”

Consultation proposals from the Law Commission include:

  • Provisions to allow arbitrators summarily to dismiss claims, made by parties, that lack legal merit.
  • Retaining current duties on the impartiality of arbitrators, with an additional provision on disclosing conflicts of interest, so that such disclosure is fully codified in the Act.
  • Further protections under the law for arbitrators: strengthening their immunity in certain cases and introducing provisions in support of equality in arbitral appointments.
  • Extending the capacity of the courts to support arbitration proceedings.
  • Refining the process for challenging the jurisdiction of an arbitrator, so that challenges in the courts take place by way of an appeal, rather than a full rehearing.
  • Retaining current provisions around confidentiality and privacy in arbitration proceedings.

Categories

Home affairs