Menu
Fri, 19 April 2024

Newsletter sign-up

Subscribe now
The House Live All
Home affairs
Rt Hon Rachel Reeves Mais lecture hits the nail on the head for construction. Partner content
Communities
By Baroness Fox
Home affairs
Historic wins, inspiring moments and British success: MPs share what they’re looking forward at the Paris Olympics Partner content
By UK Sport
Communities
Veterans falling victim to plague of process  Partner content
Communities
Press releases
By UK Sport

Retained EU Law entering last chance saloon in House of Lords – now is the time to listen

Credit: Adobe

Peter McGettrick, Chairman

Peter McGettrick, Chairman | British Safety Council

3 min read Partner content

The Government is rushing ahead far too quickly with the review of EU regulations and putting the UK's hard won reputation for health and safety at risk in the process.

The Retained EU Law (REUL) Bill being debated in the House of Lords on Monday 6 February is a key moment for a piece of legislation which threatens to put our health, safety and the environment at greater risk.

Having passed the Commons, on some votes by the skin of its teeth, many will now be looking to the Lords to propose some meaningful improvements and changes, which I hope the Government will now listen to.

And if not, then maybe it will have the courtesy to pay attention to the many civic organisations, charities and businesses who have been sounding the alarm in recent weeks over the impact that this ill-conceived and, frankly dangerous, legislation will have.

The UK has built an excellent record for health and safety over many decades. So why would the Government want to trash this?

In 1974, this country passed the UK Health and Safety at Work Act. We have built on its broad principles in the years since with more detailed regulations, many of which were brought in after 1990 when we belonged to the EU.

Whether we now need, or want, to have this raft of EU-based regulations is the question posed by the Government’s REUL Bill.

This piece of legislation, if passed, would set a deadline using a ‘sunset’ clause, allowing all EU-derived regulations to be wiped from the statute book from that point, unless a Minister decides that they want to retain, amend, or replace them. As it stands, that deadline is 31 December 2023, with some leeway for one or two departments. The Bill also hands Ministers extraordinary general powers to remove regulations in the future.

Yes, there are areas of our current regulations where improvements could be made, but also big risks with the Government’s current approach.

No other country has ever gone about letting its laws just evaporate in this way. This Bill would effectively create a ‘black hole’ for businesses to have to navigate themselves.

Deaths at work continue to fall, as the latest HSE figures show, and big strides have been made in terms of worker health. Without a solid floor of regulations, my fear is the great reputation the UK has built as a leader in health and safety could slip away and our already weak productivity will suffer along with people’s health and wellbeing.

The government must rethink its approach and allow much more time for the process of reviewing the thousands of regulations at stake. It took five years for it to replace EU agricultural policy alone, so why does it think it can deal with the rest in just 12 months?

If it does not, I fear the chaos, confusion, and uncertainty it will create won’t just cast a very bad shadow over Brexit, it would cause real and unnecessary future harm.

Peter McGettrick is Chairman of the British Safety Council

PoliticsHome Newsletters

Get the inside track on what MPs and Peers are talking about. Sign up to The House's morning email for the latest insight and reaction from Parliamentarians, policy-makers and organisations.

Categories

Home affairs
Associated Organisation