Menu
Sun, 5 May 2024

Newsletter sign-up

Subscribe now
The House Live All
Environment
Environment
A successful energy transition has the potential to deliver the economic growth the UK needs Partner content
By Offshore Energies UK (OEUK)
Environment
Environment
Environment
Press releases

The economic regulation of the water sector

National Audit Office

4 min read Partner content

The regulatory framework for the water industry has contributed to major improvements in water quality, according to the National Audit Office. Customers, however, have not always benefited enough from gains due to factors outside the industrys control.

The NAO estimates that water companies made net windfall gains of at least £800 million between 2010 and 2015; companies gained around £410 million from lower than expected corporation tax rates and £840 million from lower than expected interest rates, but absorbed costs and provided water bill discounts worth up to £435 million over the same period. As a result of taking on the risks of changes in taxation and interest rates, reducing fluctuations in customer bills, companies have benefitted. But they could have made a loss if interest and tax rates were higher than expected.

Today’s report also finds that, since privatisation in 1989, most measures of service quality have improved markedly, including the quality of the UK’s drinking and bathing water. The UK has to date not had to pay fines for failing to comply with EU water directives, unlike other member states.

Customer bills have increased to pay for these improvements. The average household bill for water and sewerage was £396 in 2014-15 – a 40% increase in real terms since privatisation, with most of the rise happening between 1990 and 1995 under the government’s initial price control. Bills have stabilised since but still represent an important component of household spending. Bills represented around 2.3% of average household spending in 2013, rising to over 5% for the poorest households. Companies now offer support including financial assistance measures for disadvantaged and indebted customers, expected to reach 1.8 million people by 2020. Ofwat expects bills to fall by 5% in real terms between now and 2019-2020 as a result of its 2014 price review; bills are expected to be reduced by £3 billion compared to companies’ original proposals.

Increases in bills have been moderated by Ofwat’s challenges on efficiency gains, and by the sharing of those gains with customers. Ofwat’s approach has encouraged greater company efficiency, resulting in lower customer bills, but the rate of saving is now smaller than in earlier years. Ofwat expected £39 of new efficiency savings from the average household’s annual bill between 1995 and 2000, but this fell to £11 annually for the period 2010 to 2015. Ofwat made major changes to its approach in its 2014 price review, setting more demanding efficiency targets and giving companies more responsibility for managing their costs and risks, as well as requiring companies to incorporate customers’ views within their plans.

Water companies have raised around £49 billion since privatisation to finance improvements, mostly in the form of debt. The regulatory framework includes protections against risks to customers and taxpayers arising from factors such as high debt levels, through restrictions on some actions of companies and their ultimate controllers. There are arrangements to provide service continuity in the event of company failure, but this would involve uncertain costs. Ofwat has sought to improve company governance since 2013, but it could do more to understand the corporate and financial resilience of the sector to external shocks.

“Since privatisation, Ofwat and Defra have overseen major improvements in water quality and service quality. Ofwat’s 2014 price review committed companies to improving services further over the next five years while cutting customer bills, increasing value for money for consumers. Customers, however, have not seen enough of the benefits of companies’ unexpected financial gains from factors such as falls in corporation tax rates. Ofwat made significant improvements in 2014, but its price cap regime is not yet achieving the value for money that it should.”

Amyas Morse, head of the National Audit Office, 14 October 2015

Notes:

Full report: The economic regulation of the water sector

£11.8bn
Total water company turnover in 2014-15

£396
Average annual household bill for water in 2014-15

40%
Real terms rise in household bills since privatisation in 1989

5%
Expected real terms fall in household bills between 2015 and 2020

£126 billion
Capital investment by water companies since privatisation

£64.7 billion
March 2015 regulatory capital value on which the water sector earns a financial return

£44 billion
Amount Ofwat expects the water sector to spend between April 2015 and March 2020 on improving water services, improving resilience and protecting the environment

£29.1 million
Cost of running Ofwat in 2014-15

£840 million
Our estimate of the savings to customers between 2010 and 2015 if Ofwat had used an indexation approach to calculate the allowed cost of debt

£410 million
Ofwat's estimate of the gains to companies between 2010-11 and 2014-15 from reductions in corporation tax rates after price limits had been set

Categories

Environment