Thu, 23 September 2021

Newsletter sign-up

Subscribe now
The House Live All
Space is the key to delivering the Prime Minister’s top priorities Partner content
By UKspace
Education
British para athletes make history to end our extraordinary sporting summer on a high Partner content
Coronavirus
This World Suicide Prevention Day, there are reasons to be hopeful – and we all have a part to play Partner content
By The National Lottery
Coronavirus
Education
Press releases

Government’s miserly school catch up fund confirms their lack of ambition for education

Government’s miserly school catch up fund confirms their lack of ambition for education
Paul Whiteman

Paul Whiteman

4 min read

Schools need support. That’s why the government’s failure to put their money where their mouth was such a disappointment.

It’s fair to say it’s been a difficult week for the government when it comes to education.

After months of talking big and building expectation for education recovery, the announcement of their grand plan in the end was universally greeted with cries of ‘…is that it?’

After leaked reports that the school day itself could be fundamentally changed, after the Prime Minister’s statements that ‘no child will be left behind’, after organisations such as the Education Policy Institute put a figure of around £15billion on the cost of recovery, and after reports that the government’s catch-up Tsar, Sir Kevan Collins, was indeed requesting that level of investment from the Treasury, the final announcement of £1.4billion to cover a bit more tutoring fell utterly flat. A total damp squib.

It’s difficult not to feel that our children have been short-changed

It’s not that £1.4billion isn’t a lot of money. But divided out between all the schools and school children in England, the final sum per child is paltry. It ends up at roughly £50 per head – possibly as little as £22 per primary school child, according to Kevan Collins himself. That really doesn’t buy much.

And when compared with the investment we’ve seen from other nations it looks even more miserly. In the Netherlands, the Dutch government have announced £7.3billion – about £2,500 per child. In the US, the ‘American Rescue Plan’ is costing $130billion – roughly £1,600 per child. Even closer to home in the UK, Wales have invested £72million, or £239 per child. It’s difficult not to feel that our children in England have been short-changed.

And it’s not like the Treasury is adverse to splashing the cash when they want to. The ill-fated Eat Out to Help Out scheme alone cost taxpayers £849million, and support loans for small businesses totted up to £42.2billion by the end of 2020, the vast majority of which will never be paid back. Of course, support for business is important, but it shows how far down the government’s list of priorities children and young people seem to place.

All in all, the recovery announcement only confirmed the government’s lack of commitment to education – and its lack of ambition for the next generation. The question of how much should be spent on recovery ought to have been answered with ‘whatever it costs’, such is the importance of investing in the future wellbeing of our young people and the future prosperity of our nation.

It’s no wonder Sir Kevan Collins felt he couldn’t be a part of the charade any longer and resigned. There is little point in appointing an internationally respected education expert as catch-up Tsar if you fail to listen to what they have to say.

So, what would school leaders have wanted to see announced?

Our recently published Blueprint for Recovery set out seven recommendations for the government on education recovery: prioritise the early years, improve support for children’s mental health and wellbeing, invest in the teaching profession, provide targeted academic support for pupils who need it, expand extra-curricular provision and invest in extra-curricular providers, invest in school technology, and remove unnecessary burdens and distractions from the education system.

The one thing I hear most regularly from school leaders across the country is that they don’t want or need the government to tell them how to do their jobs. Schools are already doing the work of recovery and have been since children returned to classrooms – and they will continue to put everything into helping pupils recover and succeed throughout the rest of their school careers.

What they needed from the government was support. That’s why the government’s failure to put their money where their mouth was such a disappointment. All schools are asking for is sufficient funding and resources to get on with what they know works. They don’t need to be told how to do the job, they just need the government to give them the resources and stand back.

The government doesn’t fall into this trap with other professions. It doesn’t tell doctors how to practice medicine. In fact one of the biggest successes of the whole pandemic, the vaccination programme, is a demonstration of exactly that – the government invested enough money into getting the vaccines and then handed over to the NHS and stepped back to let them crack on.

If only they’d do the same for education.

 

Paul Whiteman is the General Secretary of the National Association of Head Teahcers (NAHT).

PoliticsHome Newsletters

Get the inside track on what MPs and Peers are talking about. Sign up to The House's morning email for the latest insight and reaction from Parliamentarians, policy-makers and organisations.

Categories

Education