Voter ID plans branded ‘deeply flawed’ ahead of local elections

Posted On: 
28th April 2018

Ministers' controversial Voter ID plans have been branded as "deeply flawed" by the Electoral Reform Society, only days before their trial at the local elections.

Voter ID is set to by piloted in five councils on 3rd May.
Credit: 
PA

With pilot projects planned in Bromley, Gosport, Swindon, Watford and Woking, the campaign group warned the new system could be part of a "calculated effort" to make voting harder for some citizens.

The Cabinet Office maintains that nobody will need to buy new ID in order to vote. But a recently-leaked letter from the Equality and Human Rights Commission argues that the changes could have a disproportionate impact on voters from minority groups, who are less likely to have the required documentation.

Voter ID checks will 'disproportionately' hit minorities, says equalities watchdog

Deselected Tory council urges voters to support Labour candidates

Voters to be forced to show ID at polling stations in bid to tackle electoral fraud

Darren Hughes of the Electoral Reform Society likened mandatory voter ID to using "a sledgehammer to crack a nut".

He added: "It's time for an evidence-based approach instead. With millions of people lacking the right photographic ID - and no government plans for a universal, free alternative - this can only mean another barrier for honest voters."

Cat Smith, Labour’s Shadow Minister for Voter Engagement and Youth Affairs, said ministers had been warned "time and time again that restrictive Voter ID requirements will make it harder for people to vote".

She added: "By ignoring these concerns, the Tories appear more determined to exclude people from the democratic process. Labour wants everyone’s voices to be heard in the local elections next Thursday, which is why we are calling on the Government to abandon these dangerous pilots."

Changes to Voter ID laws were initially proposed by Conservative grandee Sir Eric Pickles in response to the 2015 Tower Hamlets election court judgment. His plan called for stronger checks against municipal corruption, and a clamp-down on postal vote “harvesting”.