Menu
Fri, 29 March 2024

Newsletter sign-up

Subscribe now
The House Live All
Communities
Communities
Why the community-owned business model works for rural settlements Partner content
By Plunkett UK
Communities
Communities
Press releases

Blow for government as High Court rules lone parent benefit cap is illegal

3 min read

A cap on the amount of benefits lone parents of children under two can claim “causes real misery” and is illegal, the High Court has ruled.


In a huge blow for the Government, a senior judge said the policy unfairly discriminated against some of the poorest families in the country.

The Government said it was “disappointed” with the ruling and would appeal.

Under the policy, which was introduced by the last Conservative government, parents must work at least 16 hours in order to be exempt from the cap.

The High Court case was brought by four lone parents whose welfare claims were cut because of the benefit cap, which is set at £20,000 a year outside London or £23,000 in the capital.

The court heard that the difficulties of finding child care for lone parents made it very difficult for them to find work.

Mr Justice Collins' damning verdict, which was published this morning, said: “It seems that some 3.7 million children live in poverty and, as must be obvious, the cap cannot but exacerbate this.

“The need for alternative benefits to make up shortfalls is hardly conducive to the desire to incentivise work and so not provide benefits. There is powerful evidence that very young children are particularly sensitive to environmental influences. Poverty can have a very damaging effect on children under the age of five.”

The judge added: “The cap is capable of real damage to such as the claimants. They are not workshy but find it, because of the care difficulties, impossible to comply with the work requirement.

“Most lone parents with children under two are not the sort of households the cap was intended to cover. Real misery is being caused to no good purpose.”

A Department for Work and Pensions spokesperson said: “We are disappointed with the decision and intend to appeal. Work is the best way to raise living standards, and many parents with young children are employed.

“The benefit cap incentivises work, even if it’s part-time, as anyone eligible for working tax credits or the equivalent under Universal Credit, is exempt.

“Even with the cap, lone parents can still receive benefits up to the equivalent salary of £25,000, or £29,000 in London and we have made Discretionary Housing Payments available to people who need extra help.”

But Mark Serwotka, general secretary of civil servants' union the PCS, said the benefit cap should be scrapped.

He said: “As the union that represents DWP staff, we opposed the benefit cap from the outset because we knew it was cruel and unnecessary, and would drive families into poverty and homelessness.

“We welcome the judge’s ruling and comments about the misery being caused ‘to no good purpose’, and we now call on the Government not just to tweak the cap but to scrap it entirely.”

Equality and Human Rights Commission Chief Executive, Rebecca Hilsenrath, said:

"We need a welfare and support system that is fit for purpose and helps those in need. The vast majority of people want to work, but some, for legitimate reasons, are unable to do so. We have long argued the benefits cap is unfair on certain groups and has a particularly damaging effect on women and children from poorer families. We urge the government to look again after this ruling."

 

PoliticsHome Newsletters

PoliticsHome provides the most comprehensive coverage of UK politics anywhere on the web, offering high quality original reporting and analysis: Subscribe

Categories

Communities
Partner content
Connecting Communities

Connecting Communities is an initiative aimed at empowering and strengthening community ties across the UK. Launched in partnership with The National Lottery, it aims to promote dialogue and support Parliamentarians working to nurture a more connected society.

Find out more