How the Brexit years are remembered will shape how the UK is governed in the future
The idea that Brexit has indeed been ‘resolved’ may be central not just to Boris Johnson’s past victories, but his political future too, writes Dr Alan Wager. | PA Images
4 min read
The idea that Brexit could be consigned to the past – done, solved and resolved – was central to the Conservative Party's election victory in 2019.
Boris Johnson’s promise to ‘Get Brexit Done’ won the Conservative Party a majority with a simple message: rather than dominating our politics, Brexit would be consigned to the history books.
Indeed, in a very real sense, Brexit does now feel like ‘history’. The fact the first case of Covid-19 was found in the UK on 31 January 2020, the day UK membership formally ended, gives resonance to the Arthur Schlesinger quote that ‘the increase in the velocity of history means, among other things, that the ‘present’ becomes the ‘past’ more swiftly than ever before.’
At the UK in a Changing Europe, we have set up a Brexit Witness Archive which aims to begin the process of understanding that ‘history’. From the summer of 2020, we began speaking to those actors who were involved in shaping the Brexit process – the politicians in the UK and the EU, the civil servants, the campaigners, the strategists that can make a claim to being part of shaping that process. From this week, we are releasing these interviews every week.
The institution of the House of Commons was a place that was thought – at the time – to be transformed by Brexit
Of course, this historical process is barely beginning. But, at the very least, these oral histories provide a place to start. There were some common themes that give clues about which questions will dominate future discussion of what happened in the last decade, and why it matters.
For example, the institution of the House of Commons was a place that was thought – at the time – to be transformed by Brexit. Those in favour of the procedural machinations that took place, and those that bitterly opposed them, argued that the innovations that took place would permanently upend the relationship between the executive and the legislature.
Yet the idea that this period of disruption would have any long-term effect on Parliament was broadly viewed with scepticism by our participants.
If the old rules of Westminster politics survived unscathed, then Whitehall was clearly scarred by the process. This process began with the Brexit referendum itself: Philip Hammond describes the Treasury as ‘slightly – well, not slightly, severely – bruised by that experience … being painted as the villain of the referendum campaign’.
Philip Rycroft, who led the Department for Exiting the European Union, describes the civil service as sucked into an ideological battle due to Brexit. As a result, Philip argued that:
‘I think there has been damage done … the system is now in the grip of folk who will assert their view of the way that the world ought to be, because of the ideological perception of the way the civil service worked through this time.’
In short, these interpretations of the way the civil service acted during and following the referendum in 2016 are now questions of historical interpretation that will have real-world implications for the way the UK is governed in the future.
Key to this will be how those within the governing party – the Conservatives – interpret the last five years of British politics. It is clear that the institution of the Conservative Party was transformed, a process entrenched by the lead up and result of the Brexit election. Paul Stephenson, the Director of Communications for Vote Leave and part of the Johnson campaign, recalls during the 2019 campaign that:
‘When Labour started promising everything for free, people were quite attracted to that. That was when the polls started to narrow, and we had to get it back to Brexit and we had to remind people that nothing can be done until we solve Brexit.’
Paul undercuts the historical inevitability that runs through so much political analysis. Internally, there was no certainty of victory for the Conservative Party. He also highlights the importance of the idea that Brexit could be consigned to the past – done, solved and resolved – was central to that victory.
How possible it is to sustain the idea that Brexit has indeed been ‘resolved’ may be central not just to Boris Johnson’s past victories, but his political future too.
Dr Alan Wager is a research associate at UK in a Changing Europe.
Get the inside track on what MPs and Peers are talking about. Sign up to The House's morning email for the latest insight and reaction from Parliamentarians, policy-makers and organisations.