Sat, 22 June 2024

Newsletter sign-up

Subscribe now
The House Live All
Why the future of business is mutually beneficial Partner content
Britain’s Chemical Industry Fuelling UK Growth: A Plan for the Next Government Partner content
Harnessing North East Devolution Partner content
By Port of Tyne
Construction sector could cut prison leaver unemployment with right support Partner content
Press releases
By National Federation of Builders

John Mann MP: John McDonnell’s big climb down

3 min read

John Mann MP criticises Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell for having "haplessly fallen for the Osborne trap that has been around for many months to debate."

It is strange times that we live in. The three Labour members now on the Treasury Committee have argued, including in public hearings in July, that George Osborne’s Charter for Budget Responsibility is a dangerous straight-jacket for the UK economy.

Set up as a political trick to trap Labour, Ed Balls and Chris Leslie, it has totally ensnared John McDonnell within weeks of his appointment.

Everyone knows that anti-austerity was Jeremy Corbyn’s key political theme and yet McDonnell has haplessly fallen for the Osborne trap that has been around for many months to debate.

A week ago John McDonnell was creating a complex logic to announce that Labour was supporting Osborne’s charter, trying to excuse this through definitions within the Charter. In fact the Charter is a simple document and concept, indeed its simplicity is its inherent weakness.

Then, after some of us informed the Labour whips on Sunday that we were continuing our consistent position and voting against Osborne, McDonnell has done a complete U-turn. He cites changes in the international economy that are so large, so significant and that have only happened in the last two weeks for his change of heart (I honestly am not exaggerating this!).

Just one hour before the Parliamentary Labour Party was due to meet, without McDonnell choosing to speak, he announced his U-turn. Yet in all of this time there has been no debate, nor any consultation within the Labour Party. So two contradictory policy announcements, without a single collective discussion.

The reality is that to have voted with Osborne would have led to political meltdown in Scotland and McDonnell’s political judgement faces some big questions. New Corbyn supporters would have been bemused and demoralised. It would have been a political disaster with huge consequences.

But the economic arguments are much more important than this. Tying a Chancellor’s hand through legislation is shockingly bad economics. Nobody knows what is around the economic corner, be it  rises in oil prices, fall-out from the EU referendum or Syria. To straight-jacket the economy in this way commanded no support whatsoever from the economists the Treasury Committee interviewed on the subject and clearly does not command support from the Governor of the Bank of England.

If McDonnell had got his way it would also have been a ringing endorsement for Osborne’s reduction in the amount the state spends on public services, undermining every argument that Labour is making.

Osborne set a trap, McDonnell fell into it and ironically it has been the consistent stubbornness of me and others that have saved the day. We cannot afford another misjudgement like this.

PoliticsHome Newsletters

Get the inside track on what MPs and Peers are talking about. Sign up to The House's morning email for the latest insight and reaction from Parliamentarians, policy-makers and organisations.

Read the most recent article written by Lord Mann - Lords Diary: Lord Mann


Engineering a Better World

The Engineering a Better World podcast series from The House magazine and the IET is back for series two! New host Jonn Elledge discusses with parliamentarians and industry experts how technology and engineering can provide policy solutions to our changing world.

NEW SERIES - Listen now