Mon, 29 November 2021

Newsletter sign-up

Subscribe now
The House Live All
Education
Diagnostic discovery and preparing for the next pandemic Partner content
Coronavirus
Championing progress on inclusion in advertising: a view from government and industry Partner content
Education
Rates of problem gambling are falling, but on the BGC's second anniversary, our commitment to safer gambling is stronger than ever Partner content
Health
Education
Press releases

Minor changes can have a ‘significant impact’ for summer-born children

Minor changes can have a ‘significant impact’ for summer-born children
3 min read

Conservative MP and former minister Stephen Hammond MP writes about his adjournment debate tonight on ‘summer-born children and Department for Education guidelines’.

As with most Adjournment Debates, the reason for applying for tonight’s debate started with an issue raised by constituents.  Research showed this to be a national issue on which some progress had been made but more needed to be done.

It is well documented that summer-born children can suffer long-term development issues and can lag in their educational attainment as a result of their date of birth.  Some children are even labelled as needing special educational help when again their problem is their date of birth.

Whilst there are no statutory barriers in place to a child being admitted outside the normal age group, there are some formidable hurdles.  Summer-born children are defined as being born between 1 April and 31 August although the reality is that the vast majority of applications to defer are from parents of children born in July and August.

____________________________________________________________________________

RELATED CONTENT

New project to help children be ready for school

____________________________________________________________________________

Whilst the Government has set out a Code of Practice and guidelines, unfortunately there is no consistent application of the rules.  Initially there is the issue that some councils refuse to defer with no parental right of appeal.  Thereafter, the two most common issues after a refusal to defer are firstly that parents are told that a child can defer entering Reception but must join Year 1 as per that child’s normal cohort.  Secondly parents are told that they can defer Reception, proceed with primary education with the new cohort but must reapply at Year 5 or Year 6 to defer secondary education or face going from Year 6 to Year 8 missing Year 7.  These are both highly unsatisfactory and worrying to both the child and the parents.

I think we need a system flexible enough to allow children to start education at the right point in their development.  Nick Gibb and the DfE have been excellent; there are guidelines in place but their application is uncertain.  Tonight I hope to persuade the Minister to revise his guidelines.  Firstly, I wish to clear up the distinction between defer and delay.  Ideally I want parents to have an automatic right to delay a start date to education if a child is born between 1 June and 31 August.  I would like it then clarified that the child will then remain in that cohort throughout the whole of their school career – both primary and secondary.  Ideally the above must apply to pre-term premature born children.

I am hopeful that these relatively minor changes to the guidelines which favour parents and take discretion from local authorities will meet the Minister’s approval.  These may be small changes but will have significant impact for summer-born children.

PoliticsHome Newsletters

Get the inside track on what MPs and Peers are talking about. Sign up to The House's morning email for the latest insight and reaction from Parliamentarians, policy-makers and organisations.

Read the most recent article written by Stephen Hammond MP - The A-Level results process has been painful, yet this is not the end of the crisis

Tags

Education

Categories

Education