Menu

Login to access your account

Mon, 6 April 2020

Personalise Your Politics

Subscribe now
The House Live All
Ensuring delivery systems to help keep the nation alive Member content
Economy
VentilatorChallengeUK consortium has the skills and tools to make a difference and save lives Member content
Coronavirus
Member content
By Confederation of Timber Industries
Economy
Press releases
By IPSE

Developers pay but communities miss out

National Federation of Builders

2 min read Member content

£125m taken from developers goes unspent in City of London alone.


The National Federation of Builders (NFB) has called on the Government to reform the way developers contribute to local communities after the City of London revealed that millions of pounds remain unspent.

With so little transparency around developer contributions, NFB lobbied the Government to introduce legislation requiring councils to publish details of where contributions were being spent. This legislation came into force in September 2019.

Figures reveal that in the City of London, between April 2016 and March 2019, developers paid £619,760 in monitoring fees. Yet in the same period, the city spent just £142,350 on monitoring and, when added to balances from previous years, has built a surplus of £1.2m.

For section 106 planning obligations, which among other matters includes affordable housing, the city received £237.2m from industry but spent only £148.9m. £6.8m was earned in interest and a surplus of £95.1m has been accrued.

On community infrastructure, which is charged through a levy titled CIL, the city received £30.1m, spent £1.4m and has a remaining balance of £28.7m.

With many hundreds of local authorities also collecting development taxes, the new reporting rules must encourage councils to be transparent on how the levy will be spent, reduce them when there is a surplus, or ensure they are returned to industry.

Richard Beresford, chief executive of the NFB, said: “Developers contribute millions of pounds to their communities, yet too much of it is held, rather than being reinvested. The City of London has profited on monitoring fees to the tune of 435% and has an unspent balance of £125m. Our members are operating on tight profit margins and often in demanding conditions but still they are meeting their obligations. For the authorities to then not invest that money in their communities is simply not good enough.”

Rico Wojtulewicz, head of housing and planning policy for the House Builders Association (HBA), said: “As well as unspent fees and developer contributions, the industry wastes months and even years negotiating agreements and this ultimately increases construction costs. It’s time the Government reformed the contribution process and replaced negotiated taxes with set levies.”

Categories

Economy
Associated Organisation
Partner content
The Cybersecurity Summit

Join Cyber Security and ICT professionals from across central government, local government, law enforcement and wider public sector, to tackle key issues at the heart of UK public sector.

Find out more