Sat, 22 June 2024

Newsletter sign-up

Subscribe now
The House Live All
Why the future of business is mutually beneficial Partner content
Britain’s Chemical Industry Fuelling UK Growth: A Plan for the Next Government Partner content
Harnessing North East Devolution Partner content
By Port of Tyne
Press releases
By National Federation of Builders

Three Cabinet ministers publicly urge Theresa May to rule out no-deal Brexit

3 min read

Brexit should be delayed if Parliament does not approve a deal in the coming days, Greg Clark, Amber Rudd and David Gauke have publicly warned Theresa May for the first time.

Writing in the Daily Mail, the trio signalled that if the European Research Group of Tory eurosceptics does not back Mrs May's deal they will throw their weight behind a plan to extend Article 50 and delay Britain’s exit from the EU.

In their joint article, the Cabinet ministers said: "If there is no breakthrough in the coming week, the balance of opinion in Parliament is clear – that it would be better to seek to extend Article 50 and delay our date of departure rather than crash out of the European Union on March 29.

"It is time that many of our Conservative parliamentary colleagues in the ERG recognised that Parliament will stop a disastrous No Deal Brexit on March 29. If that happens, they will have no one to blame but themselves for delaying Brexit."

Mrs May next week faces a major cross-party attempt to block a no-deal Brexit.

On Wednesday the Commons will vote on an amendment from senior Labour backbencher Yvette Cooper and former Conservative minister Sir Oliver Letwin which would hand MPs the power to press for an extension to Article 50 if the Prime Minister has not secured backing for a deal by mid-March.

Mr Clark, the Business Secretary, along with Ms Rudd, the Work and Pensions Secretary, and the Justice Secretary, Mr Gauke, praised Mrs May's "extraordinary determination and resilience".

But they made clear that a no-deal Brexit, which remains the default option if MPs do not swing behind Mrs May's EU agreement, would leave Britain "poorer, less secure and potentially splitting up".

"It would be truly remarkable if this was as a consequence of Conservative MPs voting down the deal. We must be the party that promotes business, protects our security and preserves the Union," they added.

"None of this would be achieved by pursuing a No Deal Brexit.

"The Government’s policy is to leave the European Union on March 29 with a deal that protects our economic and security interests. That date is less than five weeks away and time is running out.

"If we cannot achieve a parliamentary breakthrough in the next few days, the country will face a choice. We could crash out on March 29 or we could try to leave with a deal at a later date. Beyond the next few days, there simply will not be time to agree a deal and complete all the necessary legislation before March 29."

But the intervention from the three top ministers earned a stinging rebuke from one Brexiteer Conservative.

Andrew Bridgen told the BBC's Today programme: "What they are actually saying is that they are rejecting collective responsibility of being in government, they are rejecting government policy.

"In that case, they should do the honourable thing and resign from the government immediately."

PoliticsHome Newsletters

PoliticsHome provides the most comprehensive coverage of UK politics anywhere on the web, offering high quality original reporting and analysis: Subscribe

Read the most recent article written by Emily Prescott - Boris Johnson to serve Christmas lunch to UK troops in Estonia


Brexit Economy
Engineering a Better World

The Engineering a Better World podcast series from The House magazine and the IET is back for series two! New host Jonn Elledge discusses with parliamentarians and industry experts how technology and engineering can provide policy solutions to our changing world.

NEW SERIES - Listen now