Government risks ‘stumbling into dangerous territory’ over the use of ‘killer robots’, Lords warn

Posted On: 
16th April 2018

The Government is at risk of "stumbling into dangerous territory" over the use of "killer robots", a new report from peers has warned.

The Lord's warned that the UK's definition of an AI weapon was "out-of-step" with other allied countries
Credit: 
PA Images

The report by the House of Lords Artificial Intelligence Committee says autonomous weapons with the power to "hurt, destroy or deceive" human beings could be developed if the Government does not better control the use of AI.

It says the Government risks “stumbling through a semantic haze into dangerous territory” if it fails to provide more clarity on what classifies as an autonomous weapon.

Artificial intelligence to target mass-benefit fraud gangs

Government announces review to boost artificial intelligence sector

Amber Rudd: UK cyber defences will be tested in major security war game

Two per cent Defence spending pledge is 'not enough', minister warns

The peers warn that the Government’s definition of a lethal AI weapon is out-of-step” with most other NATO nations, including the US – making it harder to create international laws around the use of the lethal technology.

Digital Minister Matt Hancock argued that progress was being made.

“We think that the existing provisions of international humanitarian law are sufficient to regulate the use of weapons systems that might be developed in the future," he said.

“Of course, having a strong system and developing it internationally within the UN Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons is the right way to discuss the issue.”

But the report accusses the Government of “hamstringing” international efforts to provide clarity around AI, and warns that it could result in an “ill-considered drift” towards the use of autonomous weapons.

Committee Chair Lord Clement-Jones said that an “ethical approach” to the use of AI would help secure the benefits of the technology while mitigating against its misuse.

“The UK has a unique opportunity to shape AI positively for the public’s benefit and to lead the international community in AI’s ethical development, rather than passively accept its consequences," he said.

“The UK contains leading AI companies, a dynamic academic research culture, and a vigorous start-up ecosystem as well as a host of legal, ethical, financial and linguistic strengths. We should make the most of this environment, but it is essential that ethics take centre stage in AI’s development and use.

“AI is not without its risks and the adoption of the principles proposed by the Committee will help to mitigate these. An ethical approach ensures the public trusts this technology and sees the benefits of using it. It will also prepare them to challenge its misuse.”